|
Same Segment Start and End Point Warning ( x! A6 }' l9 C0 R# e% J6 u9 K9 r+ x4 ]
Reply How do I get rid of these warnings? They seem to happen with the edges of auto-generated fills. There are usually dozens of them on layers with ground fills. I've historically ignored them, but they are annoying me.
6 A% ]7 f9 R* j8 i; r6 t
( B, T" N; V( K2 FWARNING: Segment with same start and end points at
5 B7 O+ }0 D( _3 N(8205.122 2561.020) will be ignored. Increasing output
4 n8 y) r x" d4 g+ ^$ f8 d9 \accuracy may allow segment to be generated.8 F: ^4 | v* i8 @9 d6 K Q
/ U# [ i+ O( X, a" ?& L( tMy design accuracy is 3 decimal places. My units of measure are mils. My RS274X gerber output accuracy is 5 decimal places.
+ Z& K4 @ ~- p9 X( o7 y, S" w$ y
5 V$ U9 O3 M$ J0 `! Q5 F1 ?
2 l! T, D6 a1 {- a! A2 q; m
--Mark/ b- b# Z, E6 U1 f! F
1 \& U+ |# e( j; B
& Z& b- @, H3 }8 r1 K1 C' C
/ A) y, m0 W% i. `1 C% L + ~0 h2 {4 ^0 Q, m$ [( P9 t
Post Points: 50
6 j4 t, s0 l$ `: a' u; u3 s; L1 ?! P* Z2 r" @. R6 S$ l- X2 b, n
" h) G' @ f4 X: `+ [7 W; s
Fri, Oct 29 2010 7:48 AM , Z, B9 m9 b( q$ r0 R2 {
6 w1 u8 M; A; [7 g5 c/ X& z
oldmouldy . S% S2 b. O. v/ s: N) F3 Y
% V# S- w* [. j/ P ( l# a9 ^. {- i5 S
Joined on Tue, Jul 15 2008 6 h# y% A2 L: h# V; I. I
Woking, Surrey
0 u. ^7 r: u9 UPosts 1,138
$ ], f( Q5 ^1 x3 C* _) V& S: jPoints 19,145 4 K/ [6 b$ P8 D ~ x# a
Re: Same Segment Start and End Point Warning * S3 w* o* i! J: w% G k% j! H
Reply You should get this reported to Cadence, or your Cadence VAR, to get this investigated futher. It might be configuration or design related but the Cadence folks should be able to get to the cause of the issue and come up with some resolution.
0 e' a6 t0 @5 o$ Z% y 7 p) D6 q& \6 ^* `) {6 |& A' t
4 m. E u5 n* ]; w0 r z$ `& l8 TPost Points: 5 % |+ k2 m2 s7 z7 t( C
. j6 @7 n# B6 e2 e3 V/ j4 o2 `6 c' W% Q Y- R6 T
Fri, Oct 29 2010 11:29 AM ( n$ q1 H2 c a8 P3 B
+ p0 e2 `: t- j& r E
KEN13 4 l* p7 z1 `$ v) V
5 j, Q* q( ^! K% P1 q0 D4 y
# @1 v8 T$ S" }7 TJoined on Wed, Aug 6 2008
4 o' G) ~4 t; }4 k+ z. G5 cBarkhamsted, CT - U3 P+ ^/ }+ n$ N5 \/ t
Posts 99
d6 o# S& V! W S' CPoints 1,580 0 r$ Y9 H T: |- {& w9 G7 o# W
Re: Same Segment Start and End Point Warning
! C& D+ ]; D) ~0 u5 I* J0 g+ S' {7 uReply Just a thought...by chance was anything brought in from AutoCad file. I know when I have worked between Layout to AutoCad to PCB Editor and had a square drawn translating to AutoCad it would add a dot at the end point of each line. Could this be the problem
, A% W2 y; B8 p' L9 f5 M
% x" K5 _3 }7 [! V' E% F: t' k- MHave a good day, Ken Capture 16.5 S022, Layout 16.2.0p001, PCB Editor 16.5 S025
" E! ^% C& _. [0 p
# v2 D, ]. D! j2 I; j1 RPost Points: 5 * c2 ?0 M' P1 _; X+ q0 {
' d' p) i. t2 g0 c: I0 }9 f- D0 |) h, G: H" C. r
Fri, Oct 29 2010 12:23 PM
3 K! A" U0 h% H* ~6 \7 y. F' C9 b" t! e" e0 q
Rik Lee 6 p w, ?# }0 J! {9 b# a" I- L0 j
! v- v* ^, ~& G4 U0 ?; m3 R
$ C6 h/ a0 e. f, T2 W8 gJoined on Tue, Dec 2 2008 4 {- u0 `: ~, R. a' r
HOME, SC ( [4 x' @2 o4 y
Posts 166
2 t- ~' R7 a$ n4 o" VPoints 2,715 3 b6 r4 v, @2 B7 Y; y& j
Re: Same Segment Start and End Point Warning
) ]& s- x2 ~# y: l3 PAnswer Reply When you state that your desing has an accuracy of 3 do you mean that in the Design tab of the Design Parameter Editor the Accuracy = 3 or do you mean 0?
& o5 o+ o5 z/ _# H
: P) V) O0 {4 u3 KIf your design is in MILS with an accuracy of 3 that equals .000001 inches and your output is 5 decimal places or .00001 inches which is one decimal place less than the design is at.
/ L' S1 i8 u6 K" W0 C) N8 i% M9 X, l% \# }5 ?: u
When using Raster based artwork you should use an accuracy in the design that will allow the artwork to generate the data without the possibility of rounding down. Generally the use of a MILS 1 database (.0001 inches) or equivilent will eliminate any problems with rounding down data.% `4 q; a, c* v0 z; B& t5 D
% V+ F/ P4 E% L4 B' E $ t9 w/ }! \9 l: r4 a
Post Points: 20
% @' P# c3 a' D' ~+ c* x
$ T# m6 l5 ~( Q8 W' ^' q% `$ S: c9 b, F; H: N
Fri, Oct 29 2010 12:55 PM * ?9 U6 b C' B* `2 E0 G& N
M, z2 z1 q( C; W* c n' j
melview1
6 n9 O. e- U4 Z7 {) J2 L
7 N% v7 m. l- [% U5 L+ v6 n / x: A0 w: t/ g" n ]7 E8 k
Joined on Wed, May 20 2009 3 _& e7 F2 ?8 Q3 z) E
Shakopee, MN
7 @: F7 A, [6 Y5 e, L' oPosts 41
" w2 S$ L( r% W) X7 KPoints 785
+ E( h- T8 m/ m& n Re: Same Segment Start and End Point Warning
r: b, c+ z+ H, TReply Rik Lee, Accuracy = 3 in the Design Parameters Design Tab.
. l4 |5 s7 K# e
0 E# ?3 y( V1 N m4 M9 q; dI changed it to Accuracy = 2 (accuracy of 0.00001" ) to match the 5 decimal place artwork accuracy (0.00001" ) and that got rid of the warnings. Now I just have to go back and fix the 171 DRC Errors that changing the accuracy generated. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6fb2/e6fb2215515cf94972b409ab3efcffb0755b6ae3" alt=""
4 p* n0 a( C* d! I" d9 M6 n k& [: a) Q1 u
Thank you very much. Life just got a bit easier.( X, z3 ?; _2 R2 o) w
: v1 |$ o- [% t6 i! |) X
R# d7 h5 b5 h0 O- u8 c$ V8 R5 d5 X, R6 t0 m3 j6 O: t# V
--Mark7 F. d1 J% S7 A8 W
$ V2 k. O5 f) u1 z
6 z. e7 |* p) a. W- A: O! g( Y
Post Points: 20 % U/ b, n" ]# i9 O3 J
e2 t. n1 v$ J l6 X) j
( \4 U7 R' Y" p# ^( F0 [9 D( l Sun, Oct 31 2010 9:21 AM ' I) y- w) O% c0 G& b
! M, D3 ~( C5 F& |# t# ]4 _$ l Rik Lee / o7 C0 X" j' y, d' d- V
/ U- z& {" P3 |' u
" _; p$ \8 z+ V# O) s0 SJoined on Tue, Dec 2 2008 3 w2 \ s2 i. h6 B& w, U
HOME, SC : o; K! s4 l! t2 @2 {1 [
Posts 166
2 g$ G9 I/ L0 q/ k1 t# J5 K7 Y" uPoints 2,715 ; X/ i1 ^# p& M. q6 Q2 l/ u
Re: Same Segment Start and End Point Warning
9 H y* ^$ z4 S2 h& Y FReply Mark,0 X- x7 \5 Z9 ?2 Q- [4 R
Z+ w9 l) r7 R" V$ NI'd suggest, when using raster artwork, that you desin in no greater than an accuracy of MILS 1 (.0001 inches). This will allow your artwork accuracy to generate data at the full precision of it's output without the possibility of rounding down data.% A5 B" q/ [" F; C2 V# F5 a/ l1 {
; x2 k+ J" L G5 x- a' s( U; d~Rik * k3 M. F; h8 b8 ^, B n, [
2 q/ U+ G: Z4 B7 D
+ q' ^8 d: G4 F2 C" A9 N% K+ y |
|